The Scarcity Myth

When a man is emasculated he reacts with over-masculinity, this is the exact way our monetary system is deliberated to; we are put into an idea of scarcity to always strive for more and even accumulating excess reserves beyond ever being able to use the reserve under any circumstance. If only, it is realized that the redistribution causes equality and more than sufficient resource for all, this myth can be broken.

The reason to failure in all our systems today is the divisional ratio between competition and cooperation; the interdependence on the free flow of need/want paradigm is what decides any system’s sustainability and its lifetime and stability. We find this ratio so very evidently stabilized in nature and throughout ecology that it is almost impossible to ignore such a sustainable management method and workability of such a system. It is just in the human nature or psychology that we think about cooperation more often as a resort than a necessity and take competition as a necessity instead, which obviously is today, ultimately driving us to the non-sustainability and recurring collapse that we notice so very often and becomes more often and concentrated each time as it passes; because, we really don’t follow to thrive for its recuperation while it collapses. As once said by Sir Einstein, “we cannot solve a problem with the same level of consciousness which created it”, we cannot expect for things to get better with more competition. We have a very essential element of any sustainable system missing in our management and systems today, cooperation. Competition has helped us progress to where we are, made us build cities and tall buildings, even escalated life style, but it has also set us to limitations from where we could be if we’d cooperate than compete to work together n rise us to paramount, build civilizations and not just hollow cities standing on canes of steel, covered with concrete and glass which break by a little fire or a tiny shake of the earth and not stand straight like the mighty nature which sustains and grows with changes. Competition has given us choices, but at such diminishing value that we’d rather have none. The constant rise and fall of our economy and depreciating value of money and men is a result of none other than our today’s religious and fundamental competitive conduct.

 Are we still going to compete for succession or cooperate towards it?

- The Civil Illuminator