Religion Paradox

We often like to think of ourselves to live in truth and honesty. No one likes to live in falsehood. But reality seems to escape from our hands each time we fist our palms to catch hold of reality. That is because we do not live an objective reality. We are prominently dependent on our subjective realities. We choose our realities and life philosophies, which fits the pattern of our convenience. Convenient truth is not the rational one, because a rational truth is supposed to be unbiased and highly objective.

There is no big an example as religion when it comes to subjective philosophy.

Religion has dominated over humanity for about as long as we can remember humanity to exist, in one form or another. Roots of its philosophy is more than a mystery to all, regardless of its acceptance or trial of invalidation through rationalization of its creation, no one can truly objectively explain the beginning of this philosophy based on any credible facts; nor can anyone prove the validity of any religion with concrete admissible evidences. Yet almost all of humanity still chooses to accept which none knows about from its very commencement to its admirable teachings to what we come to understand of it as off today.

Religion is undoubtedly the most misunderstood and ill understood part of human reality; because it is religion that has killed millions and it is religions that has build civilizations, morals, ethics, behavior, culture, tradition and much more. It is almost incomprehensible to our minds how far has it got us and how much it has stopped us.

This does not mean religion is fake nor do I claim its authenticity and validity. The problem is, religion has been altered a numerous times by our political and religious authorities to claim fraudulent propositions as ultimate reality which is finely tuned in their convenience. But when investigated and researched most people are shocked to find the abundance of sacred knowledge and messages administered in religious teachings both directly and indirectly (in metaphorical manners). This is why all religions is built on the foundations of stories and legends which give you both direct messages and metaphorical indirect messages, for which we need real legitimate thinkers/teachers to convey the metaphorical messages similar to how scientists would study the complex sciences and convey the scientific laws and knowledge in a very simple and direct form.

The reason why all religions are highly flawed and questionable today is the same reason to why all our systems today are going towards its perishable moment and self-destruction; it’s the clash of subjective verses objective choices. Even many scientists and doctors today are giving fraudulent information and analysis to make a quick buck, and slowly altering the origin and basis of science itself by the spread of these false sciences. Religion has been around for more than we can comprehend, and it has been going through this very cycle of fraud and falsification and alteration over a great period of time that has resulted it to be as it is today.

Religion is no more than a philosophy when not understood, and it is no less than any science when studied, it is a collaboration of both the subjective and the objective, which is what makes it so confusing yet fascinating and above all, relevant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLrt6mGR8To&feature=youtu.be

-The Civil Illuminator

[Read more]

Progressio​n towards Singularit​y

We are unable to decide if we want to follow our left or right brains but undoubtedly we are eventually moving towards the left-brain singularity although with a little time and convenience but it is happening rapidly.

Our brains are divisible in two main hemispheres, left and right, each responsible for separate functions. The left-brain is responsible for logic, possesses analytic skills, identifies important problems, moves in a sequential order and processes information in a linear manner; very much like our modern computers, almost lifelessly doing its job. The right brain is creative, moves randomly from task to task, processes information holistically, uses intuitions to solve problems and sees end solution clearly. Now what most people today, including scientists, fail to understand is that a steady balance and growth of both the hemispheres equally is necessary for our vital growth and evolution. We are remarkably left-brain dependent today. Feelings, emotions, experiences, intuitions, etc. seem just not to matter these days and their importance is rapidly diminishing further as we evolve into the left-brain singularity as we are progressing right now.

We had law and regulations based on both left and right brain hemispheres to satisfy the needs of both emotions and logic, but as we progress today, we see a significant growth rate in the industries, law & regulations and culture in support of only left-brain function and a minimalistic attention to fulfill the requirements of the right-brain function.

This is a very significant phase in evolution of human history, as the result of left-brain singularity can be just phenomenal which could possibly make us less “human” as we call ourselves, which we again comprehend as a right-brain creature with emotions, feelings, ethics, etc. because ethics are irrational, morals are irrational and our left-brain does not comprehend and validate the irrational, it only validates and understand the rational. So what we might become is a rational computing operating systems without any purpose, psychological needs, ethics, morals, values, as these are all irrational and right brain functions. This is why we notice a remarkable decline of morals, values, promises, faith, ethics etc. today, because people are literally evolving towards the left-brain singularity every moment as they experience and tune into the modification. Human robots, as bizarre as it may sound; it might be our potential reality of the coming years in succession of our choices today.

-The Civil Illuminator

[Read more]

Are we Purpose or Profit Driven?

We often, these days, tend to complicate things rather than simplify them. Has anyone ever thought why?

Why do we find the need to complicated and boggle ourselves when we could just keep things simple and live with ease?

So lets simplify things a little for now.

We often think of science as a very complicated mess understood by the brainiest people of the world to lead us to the betterment in almost all aspects. But what science really means at its true core is rational reasoning.

So lets look into that for a second and simplify it to understand its true nature. 

What is rational? 
According to most dictionaries it means: agreeable to reason, sensible and reasonable/sound judgment. 

What is reason?

It is a form of judgment by a process of logic.

Now logic is defined as ‘reasoning conduction or assessed according to strict principles of validity: experience is a better guide to this than deductive logic.’ Then why is that we need “logical reasoning” or “science” to validate the credibility of any and all experiences, while we discover that the core of science itself is pretty crooked up which is jumbled up and ultimately is just logical/mythical judgment on the basis of no true or real evaluation and it goes round and round back to the same point like hovering in a cycle which we take as a legitimate explanation instead. In fact, we could just keep going more and more deep into this mess of definitions and justifications to just this one word/idea of science as an example even.

We often forget that there is a reason/purpose to everything we do and if not then there should be. I hope this is agreeable. So then, when we peep into our lives today how many of us really think of the purpose of anything at all? For instance, the defined or better said, the marketed purpose to schooling is to make one educated; civilized and so one could understand the true realities of nature and world for the betterment.

How many of us today, go to schools for having a better potential of earning and ease to attain luxury or “economic security” as some of us would like to call it?

We school ourselves forgetting its prime purpose we joined in for and get distorted to making more profits instead.

We, strictly just in my opinion, are driven by profit and driven away from purpose.

But what is this profit for? What is the purpose of it; looking at it scientifically or reasoning it rationally? If it is for the betterment then we could do it anyway just by following what we had to at the first place, following the prime purpose of any activity, why take the twisted complicated route to uncertainly attain which is certainly attainable with simplicity and ease?

We today, in my opinion, are lost and boggled between the choice and nature of purpose and profit. We strive for either with no certainty of its true nature and purpose. Its like, we get in a bus with no idea of where to get of and why so or why not.

We have profits to attain luxury, which leads us to comfort, which leads us to happiness. But come to think about it what then? Why do we need or want to be happy? We don’t see our nature trying to comfort itself with profits and it seems to have been fine for the past several million years.

We are lacking to find purpose in everything we do today which is why, in my opinion, we are lost and have got no idea where to go with where we are and how to go about it, especially with the ecological, biological, economical, philosophical, religious and fundamentalist reoccurring collapse lead by us to us in thriving for attaining those very purposeless pleasures which seem to comfort us and make us happy.

Reasoning or leading a scientific life in real terms by giving meaning or finding meaning of each act is how we can validate any act. Because any act without true validation losses its credibility.

So what is the credibility of what we are striving for today?

Why have we lost purpose in path to achieve the purpose itself?

- The Civil Illuminator

[Read more]

The Scarcity Myth

When a man is emasculated he reacts with over-masculinity, this is the exact way our monetary system is deliberated to; we are put into an idea of scarcity to always strive for more and even accumulating excess reserves beyond ever being able to use the reserve under any circumstance. If only, it is realized that the redistribution causes equality and more than sufficient resource for all, this myth can be broken.

The reason to failure in all our systems today is the divisional ratio between competition and cooperation; the interdependence on the free flow of need/want paradigm is what decides any system’s sustainability and its lifetime and stability. We find this ratio so very evidently stabilized in nature and throughout ecology that it is almost impossible to ignore such a sustainable management method and workability of such a system. It is just in the human nature or psychology that we think about cooperation more often as a resort than a necessity and take competition as a necessity instead, which obviously is today, ultimately driving us to the non-sustainability and recurring collapse that we notice so very often and becomes more often and concentrated each time as it passes; because, we really don’t follow to thrive for its recuperation while it collapses. As once said by Sir Einstein, “we cannot solve a problem with the same level of consciousness which created it”, we cannot expect for things to get better with more competition. We have a very essential element of any sustainable system missing in our management and systems today, cooperation. Competition has helped us progress to where we are, made us build cities and tall buildings, even escalated life style, but it has also set us to limitations from where we could be if we’d cooperate than compete to work together n rise us to paramount, build civilizations and not just hollow cities standing on canes of steel, covered with concrete and glass which break by a little fire or a tiny shake of the earth and not stand straight like the mighty nature which sustains and grows with changes. Competition has given us choices, but at such diminishing value that we’d rather have none. The constant rise and fall of our economy and depreciating value of money and men is a result of none other than our today’s religious and fundamental competitive conduct.

 Are we still going to compete for succession or cooperate towards it?

- The Civil Illuminator

[Read more]